Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Brooks

State v. Brooks

2009 Ohio 6409, 919 N.E.2d 211, 124 Ohio St. 3d 99
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 2009
Docket2009-1516
StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 6409 (State v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Brooks, 2009 Ohio 6409, 919 N.E.2d 211, 124 Ohio St. 3d 99 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to apply State v. Brewer, 121 Ohio St.3d 202, 2009-Ohio-593, 903 N.E.2d 284.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent. *100 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mary H. McGrath and Brian M. McDonough, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brewer
903 N.E.2d 284 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 6409, 919 N.E.2d 211, 124 Ohio St. 3d 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brooks-ohio-2009.