State v. . Brooks

122 S.E. 927, 187 N.C. 857, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 23, 1924
StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 927 (State v. . Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Brooks, 122 S.E. 927, 187 N.C. 857, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 426 (N.C. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are convinced from a careful examination of the record that the instant case has been tried in substantial compliance with the law bearing on the subject, and no ruling or action on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible or prejudicial error. The validity of the trial must be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 927, 187 N.C. 857, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brooks-nc-1924.