State v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brooks

104 S.W.3d 418, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 611, 2003 WL 1961342

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 2003·No. No. ED 81018·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Khalil Brooks, appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 2000. He challenges the trial court’s decision to give the “hammer” instruction.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial did not abuse its discretion. State v. Harris, 908 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Khalil Brooks, appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 2000. He challenges the trial court’s decision to give the “hammer” instruction.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial did not abuse its discretion. State v. Harris, 908 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Brooks, 104 S.W.3d 418, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 611, 2003 WL 1961342 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

104 S.W.3d 418 (State v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related