State v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brooks

104 S.W.3d 418, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 611, 2003 WL 1961342

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 29, 2003

DocketNo. ED 81018

StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.W.3d 418 (State v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brooks, 104 S.W.3d 418, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 611, 2003 WL 1961342 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Khalil Brooks, appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 2000. He challenges the trial court’s decision to give the “hammer” instruction.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial did not abuse its discretion. State v. Harris, 908 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Khalil Brooks, appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 2000. He challenges the trial court’s decision to give the “hammer” instruction.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial did not abuse its discretion. State v. Harris, 908 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 S.W.3d 418, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 611, 2003 WL 1961342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brooks-moctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack