State v. Brooks

20 So. 905, 48 La. Ann. 1519, 1896 La. LEXIS 684
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 16, 1896·No. No. 12,253·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.

The only question in this case of an appeal from the sentence of defendant for robbery is that arising by the exclusion of one of the grand jury directed by the lower court because the juror was ascertained not to be qualified to serve. He did not participate in the finding of the indictment.

It was the duty of the court to purge the jury of disqualified jurors, and no cause of complaint was thereby afforded the defendant. State vs. Causey, 43 An. 897, and State vs. Riez, ante, p. 1446.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the sentence of the lower court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brooks, 20 So. 905, 48 La. Ann. 1519, 1896 La. LEXIS 684 (La. 1896).

20 So. 905 (State v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. De Armas v. Platt
192 So. 659 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1939)
State v. Vaughn
81 So. 745 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)
State v. Jackson
72 So. 905 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)