State v. Bronczyk
This text of 2013 Ohio 3129 (State v. Bronczyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Bronczyk, 2013-Ohio-3129.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98664
STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
vs.
JOSEPH BRONCZYK DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JUDGMENT: APPLICATION DENIED
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Case No. CR-540345 Application for Reopening Motion No. 465969
RELEASE DATE: July 17, 2013 APPELLANT
Joseph Bronczyk, Pro Se No. 594-815 2500 South Avon Belden Road Grafton, Ohio 44044
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: Holly Welsh Assistant County Prosecutor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.:
{¶1} On June 20, 2013, Joseph Bronczyk filed an application for reopening
pursuant to App.R. 26(B). Bronczyk is attempting to reopen the appeal that was
dismissed by this court on May 8, 2013.
App.R. 26(B)(1) provides that
a defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. An application for reopening shall be filed in the court of appeals where the appeal was decided within ninety days from journalization of the appellate judgment unless the applicant shows good cause for filing at a later time.
(Emphasis added.)
{¶2} In the case sub judice, no appellate judgment was announced and journalized
by this court that reviewed Bronczyk’s conviction and sentence as rendered in State v.
Bronczyk, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-540345. Thus, this court is prevented from
considering Bronczyk’s application for reopening as made pursuant to App.R. 26(B).
State v. Loomer, 76 Ohio St.3d 398, 1996-Ohio-59, 667 N.E.2d 1209; See also State v.
Halliwell, 8th Dist. No. 70369, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 285 (Jan. 28, 1999).
Accordingly, the application for reopening is denied.
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, JUDGE
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 3129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bronczyk-ohioctapp-2013.