State v. Brocca
This text of 955 So. 2d 532 (State v. Brocca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review State v. Brocea, 842 So.2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), in which the Third District Court of Appeal cited State v. Hosty, 835 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), rev’d, 944 So.2d 255 (Fla.2006), and certified the same question as was then pending review in this Court in Hosty. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3)-(4), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981).
We have since reversed Hosty and answered a rephrased certified question in a manner contrary to the decision presently on review. See State v. Hosty, 944 So.2d 255 (Fla.2006). We have thus determined and respondent does not contest that we should exercise our jurisdiction to grant the petition for review, quash the decision under review, and remand to the Third District Court for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in Hosty.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
955 So. 2d 532, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 124, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 575, 2007 WL 1011894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brocca-fla-2007.