State v. Broadway

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Broadway

8 So. 3d 570, 2009 La. LEXIS 1473

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 15, 2009

DocketNo. 2008-KP-1747

StatusPublished

This text of 8 So. 3d 570 (State v. Broadway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Broadway, 8 So. 3d 570, 2009 La. LEXIS 1473 (La. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Broadway, Henri; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 2-94-1720.

Granted in part; denied in part. The district court’s judgment denying relator post-conviction relief is vacated with respect to Claim III, regarding suppression of material exculpatory evidence, Claim IV, ineffective assistance of counsel at the guilt stage, Claim V, ineffective assistance of counsel at penalty phase, and Claim VI, relating to juror misconduct with respect to operating a gambling pool on the outcome of trial. This case is remanded to the district court for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing on the four claims, as the court initially determined, and for ruling once more on relator’s entitlement to post-conviction relief with respect to these claims. In all other respects, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Broadway, Henri; — Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. L, No. 2-94-1720.

Granted in part; denied in part. The district court’s judgment denying relator post-conviction relief is vacated with respect to Claim III, regarding suppression of material exculpatory evidence, Claim IV, ineffective assistance of counsel at the guilt stage, Claim V, ineffective assistance of counsel at penalty phase, and Claim VI, relating to juror misconduct with respect to operating a gambling pool on the outcome of trial. This case is remanded to the district court for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing on the four claims, as the court initially determined, and for ruling once more on relator’s entitlement to post-conviction relief with respect to these claims. In all other respects, the application is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 So. 3d 570, 2009 La. LEXIS 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-broadway-la-2009.