State v. Broad River Power Co.

181 S.E. 41, 177 S.C. 240, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 41
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 22, 1935
Docket14114
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 181 S.E. 41 (State v. Broad River Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Broad River Power Co., 181 S.E. 41, 177 S.C. 240, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 41 (S.C. 1935).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

*274 This is an appeal from order of Circuit Court sustaining demurrer of respondents to complaint of appellant.

Respondents take the position that appellant’s Exceptions 1, 2, 3, and 5 (a) should not be considered as they are in violation of Section 6 of Rule 4 of this Court. However, this case involves a controversy which has consumed considerable time of both the legislative and judicial branches of the State, and for this reason the Court has considered the entire matter. It is not amiss to call attention to the fact that Exception 4 and subdivisions (b) and (c) of Exception 5 are directed to grounds of the demurrer which were overruled by the Circuit Judge.

The order of the able Circuit Judge sustaining the demurrer to the complaint of appellant shows exhaustive study, and careful and painstaking thought, and is entirely satisfactory to this Court. Let the said order be printed as the judgment of this Court, and for a complete understanding of the issues involved, the complaint, but not the “Exhibits,” which are public statutes, and the grounds of the demurrer should also be incorporated in the report of the case, and it is so ordered.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonha.m and Eishburne concur. Mr. Justice Carter concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Segars-Andrews v. Judicial Merit Selection Commission
691 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)
Abbeville County School District v. State
515 S.E.2d 535 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1999)
Abbeville County School Dist. v. State
515 S.E.2d 535 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1999)
State v. Hill
444 S.E.2d 255 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)
Nichols v. South Carolina Research Authority
351 S.E.2d 155 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
Nichols v. SC RESEARCH AUTHORITY
351 S.E.2d 155 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
Masters v. Rodgers Development Group, S. C., Inc.
321 S.E.2d 194 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Winyah Nursing Homes, Inc.
320 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Stevenson v. Stevenson
279 S.E.2d 616 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1981)
Robert Trent Jones, Inc. v. B-F Ltd. Partnership
279 S.E.2d 613 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1981)
Moss v. Aetna Life Insurance
228 S.E.2d 108 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1976)
McKinney v. City of Greenville
203 S.E.2d 680 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1974)
State v. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia
175 S.E.2d 203 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1970)
Williams v. Wylie
46 S.E.2d 540 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)
Campbell v. Jordan
73 F. Supp. 318 (E.D. California, 1947)
Chitwood v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
51 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. South Carolina, 1943)
Townsend v. Richland County
2 S.E.2d 777 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
State Ex Rel. Daniel v. John P. Nutt Co., Inc.
185 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service Authority
181 S.E. 481 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 S.E. 41, 177 S.C. 240, 1935 S.C. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-broad-river-power-co-sc-1935.