State v. Britton
7 A. 679, 48 N.J.L. 371, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 29
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Parker, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McG-regíor, Paterson, Whitaker. 14.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Britton, 7 A. 679, 48 N.J.L. 371, 1886 N.J. LEXIS 29 (N.J. 1886).
7 A. 679 (State v. Britton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.