State v. Britton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Britton

261 N.W.2d 747

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 13, 1978

DocketNo. 47177

StatusPublished

This text of 261 N.W.2d 747 (State v. Britton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Britton, 261 N.W.2d 747 (Mich. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a Crow Wing County District Court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree (forced or coerced penetration), Minn.St. 609.344(c), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum term of 10 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that there was as a matter of law insufficient evidence of forced or coerced penetration, and insufficient evidence that the crime occurred in Crow Wing County. There is no merit to either contention. We affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a Crow Wing County District Court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree (forced or coerced penetration), Minn.St. 609.344(c), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum term of 10 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that there was as a matter of law insufficient evidence of forced or coerced penetration, and insufficient evidence that the crime occurred in Crow Wing County. There is no merit to either contention. We affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 N.W.2d 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-britton-minn-1978.