State v. Bristow
708 P.2d 649, 76 Or. App. 388, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3996
This text of 708 P.2d 649 (State v. Bristow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Bristow, 708 P.2d 649, 76 Or. App. 388, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3996 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving while suspended. He contends that because the suspension was based on a conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, which was subsequently determined to be void, State v. Bristow, 71 Or App 219, 691 P2d 161 (1984), the suspension order is invalid. The state concedes that defendant is correct. We agree.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Bristow
691 P.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
708 P.2d 649, 76 Or. App. 388, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bristow-orctapp-1985.