State v. Bristow
This text of State v. Bristow (State v. Bristow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000012 13-SEP-2016 08:23 AM
SCWC-15-0000012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
THEODORE ROBERT BRISTOW, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000012; CASE NO. 3DCW-14-0001486)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Theodore Robert Bristow’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 4, 2016, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 13, 2016.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Bristow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bristow-haw-2016.