State v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

Hawaii Supreme Court

State v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

DecidedJuly 29, 2025

DocketSCAP-24-0000531

StatusPublished

This text of State v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (State v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, (haw 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-JUL-2025 06:13 AM Dkt. 74 OAWST

SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, EX REL. ANNE E. LOPEZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY; SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC; SANOFI US SERVICES INC., formerly known as SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC.; SANOFI-SYNTHELABO LLC, formerly known as SANOFI-SYNTHELABO INC.; and SANOFI S.A., Defendants-Appellants.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC141000708)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Toʻotoʻo, in place of Devens, J., recused)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of All Claims and Parties, Exoneration of Supersedeas Bonds (Stipulation) submitted by Plaintiff-Appellee and Defendants-Appellants and filed on July 7, 2025, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal and bear their own costs and attorney fees; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Rule 42(b) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. Upon dismissal of the appeal, the parties may take up any further stipulations with the trial court in accordance with court rules. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 29, 2025. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Faʻauuga L. Toʻotoʻo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX 29-JUL-2025 06:13 AM Dkt. 74 OAWST

SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, EX REL. ANNE E. LOPEZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY; SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC; SANOFI US SERVICES INC., formerly known as SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC.; SANOFI-SYNTHELABO LLC, formerly known as SANOFI-SYNTHELABO INC.; and SANOFI S.A., Defendants-Appellants.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC141000708)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Toʻotoʻo, in place of Devens, J., recused)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of All Claims and Parties, Exoneration of Supersedeas Bonds (Stipulation) submitted by Plaintiff-Appellee and Defendants-Appellants and filed on July 7, 2025, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal and bear their own costs and attorney fees; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Rule 42(b) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. Upon dismissal of the appeal, the parties may take up any further stipulations with the trial court in accordance with court rules. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 29, 2025. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Faʻauuga L. Toʻotoʻo

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bristol-myers-squibb-company-haw-2025.