State v. . Briscoe
This text of 140 S.E. 212 (State v. . Briscoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J. D. Baines, deputy sheriff of Gates' County, testified in part: “The defendant bad three bottles of whiskey, one in his hand and two in his pockets. I know whiskey when I smell it.” The defendant at the time was about one hundred yards from his dwelling-house. Testimony to like effect was given by O. W. Hinton, also a deputy sheriff. Defendant testified that he had no whiskey, but what he had was vinegar. One of the counts in the bill of indictment was that defendant did unlawfully “possess intoxicating liquors.” For this he was convicted.
The defendant in his brief contends: “The court erred in charging as follows: Tt is unlawful for one to have intoxicating liquors in his possession outside of his dwelling-house in any quantity/ instead of charging as follows: 'It is unlawful for one to have intoxicating liquors in his possession outside of his dwelling-house in any quantity for an illegal purpose.’ ”
The charge as given is now well settled law in this jurisdiction. S. v. Sigmon, 190 N. C., 684; S. v. Pierce, 192 N. C., 766; S. v. Hege, ante, 526.
The charge of the court below is full, fair, and accurate, and gave defendant every right that he was entitled to under the' law. ¥e can find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 212, 194 N.C. 582, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-briscoe-nc-1927.