State v. Briscoe

258 S.W.3d 826, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 631, 2008 WL 1958937
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 6, 2008·No. ED 89475·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James J. Briscoe (Defendant) appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of eight counts of first-degree statutory sodomy in violation of Section 566.062 1 and four counts of first-degree child molestation in violation of Section 566.067. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Briscoe, 258 S.W.3d 826, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 631, 2008 WL 1958937 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

258 S.W.3d 826 (State v. Briscoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Briscoe v. State
323 S.W.3d 86 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)