State v. Briley

863 P.2d 1317, 125 Or. App. 264, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 2062
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 8, 1993
Docket92C20549; CA A78186; 92C20550; CA A79031
StatusPublished

This text of 863 P.2d 1317 (State v. Briley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Briley, 863 P.2d 1317, 125 Or. App. 264, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 2062 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

After a joint trial, defendants were each convicted of conspiracy to commit rape in the first degree, ORS 161.450, rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, conspiracy to commit sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 161.450, and sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427. They both contend that the court erred by not merging the conspiracy convictions and the principal offenses as required by ORS 161.485(3). The issue was raised below.

The state concedes that the court erred, and we accept that concession.

Convictions for conspiracy vacated in each case; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 161.450
Oregon § 161.450
§ 163.375
Oregon § 163.375
§ 163.427
Oregon § 163.427
§ 161.485
Oregon § 161.485

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 P.2d 1317, 125 Or. App. 264, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 2062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-briley-orctapp-1993.