State v. Bright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Bright

12 A.2d 677, 124 N.J.L. 451, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 290

DecidedApril 25, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.2d 677 (State v. Bright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bright, 12 A.2d 677, 124 N.J.L. 451, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

*452 Per Curiam.

This appeal challenges certain rulings of the trial court respecting the admission or rejection of evidence, the legal propriety of a portion of the charge to the jury, the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict of acquittal and other incidental matter. Upon consideration thereof we are satisfied that none of the matters complained of resulted in harmful error.

The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Parker, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*452 Per Curiam.

This appeal challenges certain rulings of the trial court respecting the admission or rejection of evidence, the legal propriety of a portion of the charge to the jury, the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict of acquittal and other incidental matter. Upon consideration thereof we are satisfied that none of the matters complained of resulted in harmful error.

The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

For affirmance — Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Parker, J. 1.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.2d 677, 124 N.J.L. 451, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bright-nj-1940.