State v. Briggs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Briggs

844 P.2d 946, 118 Or. App. 101, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 119

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 3, 1993

Docket91CR2192; CA A73610

StatusPublished

This text of 844 P.2d 946 (State v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Briggs, 844 P.2d 946, 118 Or. App. 101, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 119 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and delivery of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. He contends that the court erred in placing his conviction for delivery in crime seriousness category 6, rather than category 4. The state concedes that the court erred. We accept that concession. Defendant has withdrawn his other assignment of error.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing for delivery of controlled substance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and delivery of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. He contends that the court erred in placing his conviction for delivery in crime seriousness category 6, rather than category 4. The state concedes that the court erred. We accept that concession. Defendant has withdrawn his other assignment of error.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing for delivery of controlled substance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

844 P.2d 946, 118 Or. App. 101, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-briggs-orctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack