State v. Briggs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Briggs

844 P.2d 946, 118 Or. App. 101, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 119

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 3, 1993·No. 91CR2192; CA A73610·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and delivery of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. He contends that the court erred in placing his conviction for delivery in crime seriousness category 6, rather than category 4. The state concedes that the court erred. We accept that concession. Defendant has withdrawn his other assignment of error.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing for delivery of controlled substance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and delivery of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. He contends that the court erred in placing his conviction for delivery in crime seriousness category 6, rather than category 4. The state concedes that the court erred. We accept that concession. Defendant has withdrawn his other assignment of error.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing for delivery of controlled substance.

State v. Briggs, 844 P.2d 946, 118 Or. App. 101, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 119 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

844 P.2d 946 (State v. Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related