State v. Breshears

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Breshears

934 S.W.2d 588, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 1996 WL 595006

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 15, 1996

DocketNo. 20671

StatusPublished

This text of 934 S.W.2d 588 (State v. Breshears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Breshears, 934 S.W.2d 588, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 1996 WL 595006 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PARRISH, Judge.

Willis Breshears (defendant) appeals a misdemeanor conviction in a court-tried ease. He was charged with and found guilty of violating § 304.016.4(1), RSMo 1994, by driv[589]*589ing a vehicle to the left side of the roadway at a location where the view was obstructed by a hill.

Defendant’s trial was held October 31, 1995. After finding defendant guilty, the trial court set sentencing for November 28, 1995. Defendant filed a motion for new trial that was heard and denied November 28, 1995. The trial court then granted allocution and sentenced defendant to pay a fine in the amount of ten dollars and costs. Defendant paid the fine and costs that day. The record does not reflect that payment of the fine and costs was made under protest or with any reservation. Notice of appeal was filed December 7,1995.

“In order to preserve any issue for appeal in a criminal case where the sentence consists of a fine and costs, the defendant must make payment of the fine under circumstances that record the payment as not voluntarily made, if payment occurs before appeal.” State v. Hamm, 807 S.W.2d 692 (Mo.App.1991), citing State v. Welch, 701 S.W.2d 770, 771 (Mo.App.1985). See also State v. Zeigenbein, 878 S.W.2d 512, 513 (Mo.App.1994). Appeal dismissed.

CROW, P.J., and SHRUM, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARRISH, Judge.

Willis Breshears (defendant) appeals a misdemeanor conviction in a court-tried ease. He was charged with and found guilty of violating § 304.016.4(1), RSMo 1994, by driv[589]*589ing a vehicle to the left side of the roadway at a location where the view was obstructed by a hill.

Defendant’s trial was held October 31, 1995. After finding defendant guilty, the trial court set sentencing for November 28, 1995. Defendant filed a motion for new trial that was heard and denied November 28, 1995. The trial court then granted allocution and sentenced defendant to pay a fine in the amount of ten dollars and costs. Defendant paid the fine and costs that day. The record does not reflect that payment of the fine and costs was made under protest or with any reservation. Notice of appeal was filed December 7,1995.

“In order to preserve any issue for appeal in a criminal case where the sentence consists of a fine and costs, the defendant must make payment of the fine under circumstances that record the payment as not voluntarily made, if payment occurs before appeal.” State v. Hamm, 807 S.W.2d 692 (Mo.App.1991), citing State v. Welch, 701 S.W.2d 770, 771 (Mo.App.1985). See also State v. Zeigenbein, 878 S.W.2d 512, 513 (Mo.App.1994). Appeal dismissed.

CROW, P.J., and SHRUM, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

934 S.W.2d 588, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1700, 1996 WL 595006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-breshears-moctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack