State v. Brendell

656 So. 2d 594, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6915, 1995 WL 370807
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1995·No. No. 94-1749·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence.

Appellant was convicted of robbery with a firearm and sentenced to a suspended seven-year term in prison, with the proviso that if she successfully completes two years community control and five years probation she would not have to go to prison.

We vacate the sentence and remand this case for a proper guideline sentence. First, she must be given the three-year mandatory minimum incarceration for the use of a firearm. See § 775.087(2)(a)1., Fla.Stat. (1993); State v. Ross, 447 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. den., 456 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1984). See also State v. McKendry, 614 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, 624 So.2d 267 (Fla.1993), approved, 641 So.2d 45 (Fla.1994). Second, the innovative sentence is violative of Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988), State v. Conte, 650 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) and State v. Manning, 605 So.2d 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Third, the reasons for downward departure are ambiguous. See Knowles v. State, 654 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1st [595]*595DCA 1995); Cookston v. State, 639 So.2d 100 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. den., 649 So.2d 232 (Fla.1994).

Sentence VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing and clarification.

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brendell, 656 So. 2d 594, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6915, 1995 WL 370807 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

656 So. 2d 594 (State v. Brendell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunbar v. State
89 So. 3d 901 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Dunbar v. State
46 So. 3d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Gray v. State
915 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Gardner v. State
699 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)