State v. Braun
230 S.E.2d 766, 291 N.C. 449, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1011
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Scott BRAUN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
H. Clay Hemric, Jr., for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Ralf F. Haskell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 31 N.C.App. 101, 228 S.E.2d 466. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Braun, 230 S.E.2d 766, 291 N.C. 449, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1011 (N.C. 1976).
230 S.E.2d 766 (State v. Braun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wilkins
238 S.E.2d 659 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)