State v. Braughton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Braughton

490 S.W.3d 745, 2016 WL 1211402, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 305

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 29, 2016

DocketWD 77817

StatusPublished

This text of 490 S.W.3d 745 (State v. Braughton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Braughton, 490 S.W.3d 745, 2016 WL 1211402, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[746]*746ORDER

Per curiam:

Joseph M. Braughton appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of child molestation in the first degree, one count of statutory sodomy in the second degree, one count of attempted child molestation in the first degree, and one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree. Braughton argues that the trial court erred in allowing the State to discuss all charged counts together during its opening statement and closing argument. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[746]*746ORDER

Per curiam:

Joseph M. Braughton appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of child molestation in the first degree, one count of statutory sodomy in the second degree, one count of attempted child molestation in the first degree, and one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree. Braughton argues that the trial court erred in allowing the State to discuss all charged counts together during its opening statement and closing argument. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 S.W.3d 745, 2016 WL 1211402, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-braughton-moctapp-2016.