State v. Braughton

493 S.W.3d 421, 2015 WL 10818587
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2015·No. WD 76975·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Braughton appeals his conviction of second-degree statutory sodomy under § 566.064, RSMo. Braughton argues that the circuit court abused its discretion by permitting excerpts of the minor victim’s videotaped forensic interview to be played to the jury, and- that the court plainly erred by failing to instruct the jury on a [422] mistake-of-age defense. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).1

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Braughton, 493 S.W.3d 421, 2015 WL 10818587 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

493 S.W.3d 421 (State v. Braughton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.