State v. Braughton
Opinion
ORDER
Joseph Braughton appeals his conviction of second-degree statutory sodomy under § 566.064, RSMo. Braughton argues that the circuit court abused its discretion by permitting excerpts of the minor victim’s videotaped forensic interview to be played to the jury, and- that the court plainly erred by failing to instruct the jury on a [422] mistake-of-age defense. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).1
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
493 S.W.3d 421 (State v. Braughton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.