State v. Braswell

682 A.2d 1006, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 383
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 18, 1996·No. SC 15532·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 264 (AC 13902), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the defendant’s conviction and consecutive sentence for attempted sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-278 (b) and 53a-49 (a) and attempted delivery of narcotics to an inmate of a correctional institution in violation of §§ 53a-174 (a) and 53a-49 (a) did not violate principles of double jeopardy?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Braswell, 682 A.2d 1006, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 383 (Colo. 1996).

682 A.2d 1006 (State v. Braswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Braswell
701 A.2d 1057 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)