State v. Braswell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Braswell

682 A.2d 1006, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 383

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 18, 1996

DocketSC 15532

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 682 A.2d 1006 (State v. Braswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Braswell, 682 A.2d 1006, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 383 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 264 (AC 13902), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the defendant’s conviction and consecutive sentence for attempted sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-278 (b) and 53a-49 (a) and attempted delivery of narcotics to an inmate of a correctional institution in violation of §§ 53a-174 (a) and 53a-49 (a) did not violate principles of double jeopardy?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 264 (AC 13902), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the defendant’s conviction and consecutive sentence for attempted sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-278 (b) and 53a-49 (a) and attempted delivery of narcotics to an inmate of a correctional institution in violation of §§ 53a-174 (a) and 53a-49 (a) did not violate principles of double jeopardy?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 A.2d 1006, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-braswell-conn-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack