State v. Brantley

929 P.2d 1376, 84 Haw. 126, 1996 Haw. App. LEXIS 198
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 1996·No. No. 18611·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court, filed on November 15, 1996, withheld judgment on the second degree murder conviction of Defendant-Appellant, Mark A. Brantley (Defendant), for thirty days pending notice from the State of Hawaii (the State) of its decision on whether or not to consent to resentencing Defendant without the mandatory minimum sentence under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 706-660.1(3)(a) (1993).

On December 3, 1996, the State, by and through Artemio C. Baxa, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for the County of Maui, filed timely notice of its consent to resentencing of Defendant without the aforesaid mandatory minimum sentence.

Pursuant to the State’s notice and in accordance with the concluding paragraph of our opinion issued November 15,1996,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 4, 1994 judgment of conviction with respect to the second degree murder offense is affirmed, however, the case shall be remanded to the second circuit court for resen-tencing of Defendant without the mandatory minimum sentence under HRS § 706-660.1(3)(A).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brantley, 929 P.2d 1376, 84 Haw. 126, 1996 Haw. App. LEXIS 198 (hawapp 1996).

929 P.2d 1376 (State v. Brantley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vanstory
979 P.2d 1059 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)
State v. Jumila
950 P.2d 1201 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1998)