State v. Brannon

45 Mo. 329
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was tried at the October term, 1868, of the Johnson County Circuit Court, on an indictment for murder, and convicted of murder in the second degree and sentenced to the penitentiary.

The only point made in'favor of a reversal is that the jury, after they were impaneled and sworn, were permitted to separate. This separation was by consent of parties before any evidence was introduced, and for one night only. To say nothing about the consent given to the separation by the defendant himself, it is the well-settled doctrine in this State that the separation of a jury in a criminal case will not invalidate a verdict or furnish [331] grounds for a new trial, there being no reason to suspect that they have been tampered with, or that ,they have acted improperly. (Whitney v. State, 8 Mo. 165; State v. Mix, 15 Mo. 153; State v. Barton, 19 Mo. 227; State v. Igo, 21 Mo. 459.) And the law has been held the same where the accused was on trial for murder. (State v. Harlow, 21 Mo. 446.)

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brannon, 45 Mo. 329 (Mo. 1870).

45 Mo. 329 (State v. Brannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Muncey
135 S.E. 594 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1926)
Paramore v. Lindsey
63 Mo. 63 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1876)
State v. Carlisle
57 Mo. 102 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)
State v. Dougherty
55 Mo. 69 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)
Moore v. . Edmiston
70 N.C. 470 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1874)
Compton v. Arnold
54 Mo. 149 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1873)
State v. Matrassey
47 Mo. 295 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1871)