State v. Brandfon

123 A.2d 30, 40 N.J. Super. 328
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided June 7, 1956·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

40 N.J. Super. 328 (1956)
123 A.2d 30

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JEROME BRANDFON, ALIAS SEYMOUR R. LEVINE, JERRY ALTER AND JERRY BRANDON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted June 4, 1956.
Decided June 7, 1956.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Jerome Brandfon, appellant, pro se

Mr. Frederick T. Law, Hudson County Prosecutor, for the respondent (Mr. Frank J.V. Gimino, Assistant County Prosecutor).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The order of the Hudson County Court here reviewed, which denied the defendant's motion for credit for time previously spent in confinement in serving a sentence imposed on him in another jurisdiction, is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Coolahan in his opinion reported in 38 N.J. Super. 412 (Cty. Ct. 1955).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brandfon, 123 A.2d 30, 40 N.J. Super. 328 (N.J. Ct. App. 1956).

123 A.2d 30 (State v. Brandfon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Edwards
622 A.2d 919 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
State v. Hill
506 A.2d 373 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
State v. Allen
383 A.2d 138 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
State v. Sinacore
376 A.2d 580 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
State v. Council
349 A.2d 71 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Lipschitz v. State
128 A.2d 728 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Trautwein v. Harbourt
123 A.2d 30 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)