State v. Brandfon
This text of 123 A.2d 30 (State v. Brandfon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JEROME BRANDFON, ALIAS SEYMOUR R. LEVINE, JERRY ALTER AND JERRY BRANDON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Jerome Brandfon, appellant, pro se
Mr. Frederick T. Law, Hudson County Prosecutor, for the respondent (Mr. Frank J.V. Gimino, Assistant County Prosecutor).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The order of the Hudson County Court here reviewed, which denied the defendant's motion for credit for time previously spent in confinement in serving a sentence imposed on him in another jurisdiction, is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Coolahan in his opinion reported in 38 N.J. Super. 412 (Cty. Ct. 1955).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 A.2d 30, 40 N.J. Super. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brandfon-njsuperctappdiv-1956.