State v. Branam

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Branam

507 S.W.3d 94, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165, 2016 WL 6695388

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 15, 2016

DocketED 103051

StatusPublished

This text of 507 S.W.3d 94 (State v. Branam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Branam, 507 S.W.3d 94, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165, 2016 WL 6695388 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence P. Branam (“Branam”) appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of four counts of deviate sexual assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence P. Branam (“Branam”) appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict convicting him of four counts of deviate sexual assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2016).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 S.W.3d 94, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1165, 2016 WL 6695388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-branam-moctapp-2016.