State v. Brainerd
This text of 57 Vt. 369 (State v. Brainerd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
It is considered that the minute on this information is sufficient to answer the purpose for which it is required to be made, which is, that the court may know with certainty whether or not the offense charged is barred by the Statute of Limitations. It is as follows: “ Filed Oct. 15, 1883,” and is under the official signature of the clerk. The information could not have been filed by the clerk until [370]*370it was exhibited to him; and the minute of filing imports such exhibition, nothing else appearing; and the two things will be taken to have been concurrent. State v. Bartlett, 11 Vt. 650.
The respondent takes nothing by his exceptions, and the cause is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 Vt. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brainerd-vt-1885.