State v. Brainerd
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
It is considered that the minute on this information is sufficient to answer the purpose for which it is required to be made, which is, that the court may know with certainty whether or not the offense charged is barred by the Statute of Limitations. It is as follows: “ Filed Oct. 15, 1883,” and is under the official signature of the clerk. The information could not have been filed by the clerk until [370] it was exhibited to him; and the minute of filing imports such exhibition, nothing else appearing; and the two things will be taken to have been concurrent. State v. Bartlett, 11 Vt. 650.
The respondent takes nothing by his exceptions, and the cause is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
57 Vt. 369 (State v. Brainerd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.