State v. Bragdon

554 A.2d 1196, 1989 Me. LEXIS 55
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMarch 17, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 554 A.2d 1196 (State v. Bragdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bragdon, 554 A.2d 1196, 1989 Me. LEXIS 55 (Me. 1989).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Delmar Bragdon appeals his convictions of rliurder, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 201(1)(A) (1983), and arson, id., § 802(1)(B) (Supp. 1988), following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Cumberland County; Brodrick, J). Bragdon’s sole contention on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of those crimes. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, we conclude that the jury could rationally find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the crimes charged. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 A.2d 1196, 1989 Me. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bragdon-me-1989.