State v. Brady

655 P.2d 1132, 1982 Utah LEXIS 1067
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 20, 1982
Docket17679
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 655 P.2d 1132 (State v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Brady, 655 P.2d 1132, 1982 Utah LEXIS 1067 (Utah 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In Hardy v. Morris, Utah, 636 P.2d 473 (1981), we dismissed the appeal of a defendant who had escaped from custody, reasoning that a ruling adverse to the appellant could not be enforced because he had placed himself outside the control of the judicial system. That holding does not define whether or when such an appeal can be reinstated.

In this case, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal after conviction and sentence for aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, and unlawful taking of a motor vehicle. Five months after he commenced serving his sentence in the Utah State Penitentiary, on August 7, 1981, appellant escaped. On motion of the State, on September 21, 1981, this Court dismissed appellant’s appeal on the authority of Hardy v. Morris, supra. Thereafter, appellant was recaptured in Idaho and reincarcerated in the Penitentiary on March 23, 1982. Appellant now moves to reinstate his appeal.

By escaping and remaining at large until he was involuntarily returned to custody, appellant abandoned his appeal and now stands in the same position as if no appeal had been taken. Mitchell v. State, Fla.App., 294 So.2d 395 (1974); Weser v. State, 224 Kan. 272, 579 P.2d 1214 (1978); United States v. Smith, 544 F.2d 832 (5th Cir.1977). In this circumstance, an appeal dismissed prior to his return to custody will not be reinstated.

This action violates no right under the Utah Constitution, Art. I, § 12, since appellant had his “right to appeal” and abandoned it. It likewise violates no federal constitutional right. Estelle v. Dorrough, 420 U.S. 534, 95 S.Ct. 1173, 43 L.Ed.2d 377 (1975); Allen v. Georgia, 166 U.S. 138, 17 S.Ct. 525, 41 L.Ed. 949 (1897).

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Staker v. Ainsworth
785 P.2d 417 (Utah Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Tuttle
713 P.2d 703 (Utah Supreme Court, 1985)
Brady v. Shulsen
689 P.2d 1340 (Utah Supreme Court, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Passaro
476 A.2d 346 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Hurley
461 N.E.2d 754 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 P.2d 1132, 1982 Utah LEXIS 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brady-utah-1982.