State v. Brady

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

State v. Brady

441 A.2d 1165, 122 N.H. 110, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 296

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedFebruary 12, 1982

DocketNo. 81-199

StatusPublished

This text of 441 A.2d 1165 (State v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brady, 441 A.2d 1165, 122 N.H. 110, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 296 (N.H. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

Dennis Brady was found guilty of a parking violation in New-market District Court. The Superior Court (Contas, J.) accepted a de novo appeal, but denied the defendant’s motion to waive the $8 appeal entry fee. This appeal challenges the constitutionality of the appellate filing fee.

A violation is not a criminal offense. RSA 625:9 11(b). We see no reason to alter our holding in State v. Basinow, 117 N.H. 176, 178, 371 A.2d 458, 460 (1977), upholding such a fee.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion

Dennis Brady was found guilty of a parking violation in New-market District Court. The Superior Court (Contas, J.) accepted a de novo appeal, but denied the defendant’s motion to waive the $8 appeal entry fee. This appeal challenges the constitutionality of the appellate filing fee.

A violation is not a criminal offense. RSA 625:9 11(b). We see no reason to alter our holding in State v. Basinow, 117 N.H. 176, 178, 371 A.2d 458, 460 (1977), upholding such a fee.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

441 A.2d 1165, 122 N.H. 110, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brady-nh-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack