Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Bradsteen

State v. Bradsteen

106 P.3d 647, 196 Or. App. 634, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 15, 2004
Docket0212-73484; A120277
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 106 P.3d 647 (State v. Bradsteen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bradsteen, 106 P.3d 647, 196 Or. App. 634, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals the trial court’s decision committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period of 180 days. ORS 426.130. We reverse.

Appellant was held for five judicial days after he was placed on a hospital hold. See ORS 426.232. At the end of that period, he was placed on a second hold for five days. The hearing on his case occurred on the tenth day after the initial hold. Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the second hold violated ORS 426.232(2), which provides that “■under no circumstances may the person [held on a hospital hold] be held for longer than five judicial days.” ORS 426.095(2) requires a hearing within five judicial days except in circumstances that did not exist in this case. We agree with the parties that the statutes are unambiguous in this respect. Because the hearing did not occur within the required period, the trial court should have dismissed the case.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. D. A.
495 P.3d 176 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)
State v. C. P.
486 P.3d 845 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)
State v. R. O. W.
476 P.3d 1259 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)
State v. M. Z.
476 P.3d 1258 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)
State v. J. J. S. (In re J. J. S.)
444 P.3d 1141 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)
State v. B. L. H.
403 P.3d 538 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)
State v. R. G.-R.
395 P.3d 985 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)
State v. L. J. L.
388 P.3d 1249 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2017)
State v. W. B. R.
387 P.3d 482 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)
State v. P. G.
200 P.3d 614 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
In the Matter of Pg
200 P.3d 614 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
State v. Dezort
145 P.3d 336 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 P.3d 647, 196 Or. App. 634, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bradsteen-orctapp-2004.