State v. . Bradshaw

108 S.E. 722, 182 N.C. 769, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 331
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 26, 1921·Published

Opinion

Feu Cueiam.

Tbe following is tbe whole of tbe State’s brief:

“Tbe defendant was tried and convicted at tbe June Term, 1921, of tbe Alamance Superior Court, Hon. J. Lloyd Horton presiding, of prostitution as defined in sections 4357 et seq., of tbe Consolidated Statutes.
“Without analyzing tbe evidence, we think it is not sufficient to justify tbe verdict. It does not, we submit, bring defendant within tbe plain definition of prostitution or of assignation as contained in section 4357.”

For tbe reasons assigned by tbe Attorney-General, we think tbe defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit should have been allowed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Bradshaw, 108 S.E. 722, 182 N.C. 769, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 331 (N.C. 1921).

108 S.E. 722 (State v. . Bradshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.