State v. Bradley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bradley

502 S.W.3d 721, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 2016 WL 6208401

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2016

DocketWD78923

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 721 (State v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bradley, 502 S.W.3d 721, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 2016 WL 6208401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Tylor Bradley challenges his convictions, following a jury trial, of trespass, attempted felonious restraint, second-degree assault, and armed criminal action. Bradley failed to preserve his challenge to the prosecutor’s closing argument insofar as he failed to object when the challenged statement was made at trial. Nevertheless, Bradley contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the prosecutor to argue, in violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, that the jury should infer guilt from his silence. Because we find no obvious error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Tylor Bradley challenges his convictions, following a jury trial, of trespass, attempted felonious restraint, second-degree assault, and armed criminal action. Bradley failed to preserve his challenge to the prosecutor’s closing argument insofar as he failed to object when the challenged statement was made at trial. Nevertheless, Bradley contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the prosecutor to argue, in violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, that the jury should infer guilt from his silence. Because we find no obvious error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 721, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1084, 2016 WL 6208401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bradley-moctapp-2016.