State v. Bradley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bradley

221 S.W.3d 480, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 710, 2007 WL 1346083

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Bradley. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1369 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2007·No. No. ED 87423·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Luther Bradley appeals the judgment entered upon the jury verdict convicting him of felony attempted statutory rape in the first degree, felony statutory rape in the first degree, felony statutory sodomy in the first degree, felony child molestation in the first degree, felony sexual misconduct involving a child and felony victim tampering. No abuse of discretion by the trial court appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Luther Bradley appeals the judgment entered upon the jury verdict convicting him of felony attempted statutory rape in the first degree, felony statutory rape in the first degree, felony statutory sodomy in the first degree, felony child molestation in the first degree, felony sexual misconduct involving a child and felony victim tampering. No abuse of discretion by the trial court appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Bradley, 221 S.W.3d 480, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 710, 2007 WL 1346083 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

221 S.W.3d 480 (State v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.