State v. Bradley

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 2018·No. 17-0726·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 30, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-726 Lower Tribunal No. 72-722882 ________________

The State of Florida, Appellant,

vs.

Ray Bradley, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. De La O, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Holland & Knight and Frances Guasch De La Guardia; Miriam Ramos, City Attorney, for City of Coral Gables, as amicus curiae.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM. We affirm the order below requiring resentencing pursuant to Florida Rule

of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and

Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). As requested by the State, we

acknowledge pipeline eligibility in the Florida Supreme Court based on that

Court’s pending decision in State v. Michel, No. SC16-2187 (order accepting

jurisdiction, Jan. 18, 2017).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bradley, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

State v. Bradley (State v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Angelo Atwell v. State of Florida
197 So. 3d 1040 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)