State v. Bradley
This text of State v. Bradley (State v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 30, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D17-726 Lower Tribunal No. 72-722882 ________________
The State of Florida, Appellant,
vs.
Ray Bradley, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. De La O, Judge.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Holland & Knight and Frances Guasch De La Guardia; Miriam Ramos, City Attorney, for City of Coral Gables, as amicus curiae.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SALTER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. We affirm the order below requiring resentencing pursuant to Florida Rule
of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and
Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). As requested by the State, we
acknowledge pipeline eligibility in the Florida Supreme Court based on that
Court’s pending decision in State v. Michel, No. SC16-2187 (order accepting
jurisdiction, Jan. 18, 2017).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Bradley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bradley-fladistctapp-2018.