State v. Bradford

148 S.E.2d 247, 267 N.C. 438, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1068
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 25, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.E.2d 247 (State v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bradford, 148 S.E.2d 247, 267 N.C. 438, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1068 (N.C. 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence. The defendant offered no evidence in the trial below. In our opinion the State offered ample evidence to go to the jury on the question of assault with intent to commit rape, and we so hold.

The remaining assignments of error have been examined and they present no prejudicial error.

In the trial below we find

No error.

Moore, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.E.2d 247, 267 N.C. 438, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bradford-nc-1966.