State v. Bradac

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Bradac

611 P.2d 1025, 101 Idaho 240, 1980 Ida. LEXIS 560

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 7, 1980

DocketNo. 13157

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 611 P.2d 1025 (State v. Bradac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bradac, 611 P.2d 1025, 101 Idaho 240, 1980 Ida. LEXIS 560 (Idaho 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

SCOGGIN, Justice Pro Tem.

In early September 1978, Gary Bradac, defendant-appellant drove an acquaintance’s car without her permission to Fulton, Missouri. Bradac was arrested in Fulton for auto theft and was returned to Idaho to face the charge. He pled guilty to possession of a stolen motor vehicle and the judge sentenced him to an indeterminate prison sentence not to exceed five years. Bradac appeals the length of his sentence, arguing that the district judge should have left the sentence open for 120 days pending further psychiatric evaluation and allowing defendant the opportunity to begin treatment for alcoholism.

Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion appears. E. g., State v. Dillon, 100 Idaho 723, 604 P.2d 737 (1980); State v. Cotton, 100 Idaho 573, 602 P.2d 71 (1979).

The record indicates that the judge considered Bradac’s problems when he ordered the indeterminate sentence. According to the presentence report, Bradac’s criminal activities may not have been as involuntary as Bradac would have the court believe. The investigator felt that the use of false social security number and aliases indicated planned deceit, not a product of organic alcoholism. The trial court, however, agreed with Bradac that alcoholism was a severe problem for him, but it felt that retaining jurisdiction for another 120 days would not accomplish anything. Noting Bradac’s immediate history, the court believed that Bradac should be treated for alcoholism in a restrained setting, and that the best means for accomplishing this goal was the Veterans Administration program. In order to ensure that Bradac would be admitted into the program and remain with it, the court sentenced him to an indeterminate prison sentence. Not only did Bradac fail to carry his burden of proof, but also nothing in the record indicates an abuse of [241]*241judicial discretion. Bradac’s indeterminate sentence not to exceed five years must therefore stand.

Judgment affirmed.

BAKES, McFADDEN and BISTLINE, JJ., and DUNLAP, J. Pro Tem., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOGGIN, Justice Pro Tem.

In early September 1978, Gary Bradac, defendant-appellant drove an acquaintance’s car without her permission to Fulton, Missouri. Bradac was arrested in Fulton for auto theft and was returned to Idaho to face the charge. He pled guilty to possession of a stolen motor vehicle and the judge sentenced him to an indeterminate prison sentence not to exceed five years. Bradac appeals the length of his sentence, arguing that the district judge should have left the sentence open for 120 days pending further psychiatric evaluation and allowing defendant the opportunity to begin treatment for alcoholism.

Sentencing is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion appears. E. g., State v. Dillon, 100 Idaho 723, 604 P.2d 737 (1980); State v. Cotton, 100 Idaho 573, 602 P.2d 71 (1979).

The record indicates that the judge considered Bradac’s problems when he ordered the indeterminate sentence. According to the presentence report, Bradac’s criminal activities may not have been as involuntary as Bradac would have the court believe. The investigator felt that the use of false social security number and aliases indicated planned deceit, not a product of organic alcoholism. The trial court, however, agreed with Bradac that alcoholism was a severe problem for him, but it felt that retaining jurisdiction for another 120 days would not accomplish anything. Noting Bradac’s immediate history, the court believed that Bradac should be treated for alcoholism in a restrained setting, and that the best means for accomplishing this goal was the Veterans Administration program. In order to ensure that Bradac would be admitted into the program and remain with it, the court sentenced him to an indeterminate prison sentence. Not only did Bradac fail to carry his burden of proof, but also nothing in the record indicates an abuse of [241]*241judicial discretion. Bradac’s indeterminate sentence not to exceed five years must therefore stand.

Judgment affirmed.

BAKES, McFADDEN and BISTLINE, JJ., and DUNLAP, J. Pro Tem., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

611 P.2d 1025, 101 Idaho 240, 1980 Ida. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bradac-idaho-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack