State v. Bracken
This text of 916 S.W.2d 419 (State v. Bracken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[420]*420ORDER
Defendant, Antoine Bracken, appeals from Ms judgments of conviction, following a jury trial, for second degree murder and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to two concurrent terms of life imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from the denial of Ms Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
As to defendant’s direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opirnon would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Defendant’s convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action and the denial of defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
916 S.W.2d 419, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 265, 1996 WL 70214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bracken-moctapp-1996.