State v. Boyum

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Boyum

197 N.W.2d 218, 293 Minn. 482, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1249

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 5, 1972·No. 42922·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A jury found defendant guilty of illegal distribution of stimulant or depressant drugs in violation of Minn. St. 1969, § 152.09. An examination of the evidence discloses that there is ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict and that no prejudicial error was committed by the trial court. Although defendant contradicted some of the evidence, the weight and credibility of disputed evidence are for the jury. State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 177 N. W. 2d 778 (1970).

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice MacLaughlin, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A jury found defendant guilty of illegal distribution of stimulant or depressant drugs in violation of Minn. St. 1969, § 152.09. An examination of the evidence discloses that there is ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict and that no prejudicial error was committed by the trial court. Although defendant contradicted some of the evidence, the weight and credibility of disputed evidence are for the jury. State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 177 N. W. 2d 778 (1970).

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice MacLaughlin, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

State v. Boyum, 197 N.W.2d 218, 293 Minn. 482, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1249 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

197 N.W.2d 218 (State v. Boyum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related