Home/Supreme Court of Minnesota/State v. Boyum

State v. Boyum

197 N.W.2d 218, 293 Minn. 482, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1249
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 5, 1972
Docket42922
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 197 N.W.2d 218 (State v. Boyum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boyum, 197 N.W.2d 218, 293 Minn. 482, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1249 (Mich. 1972).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A jury found defendant guilty of illegal distribution of stimulant or depressant drugs in violation of Minn. St. 1969, § 152.09. An examination of the evidence discloses that there is ample evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict and that no prejudicial error was committed by the trial court. Although defendant contradicted some of the evidence, the weight and credibility of disputed evidence are for the jury. State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 177 N. W. 2d 778 (1970).

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice MacLaughlin, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Washington
521 N.W.2d 35 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1994)
State v. Thomas
467 N.W.2d 324 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1991)
State v. Vail
274 N.W.2d 127 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1979)
State v. Coy
200 N.W.2d 40 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 N.W.2d 218, 293 Minn. 482, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boyum-minn-1972.