State v. Boynton

331 N.W.2d 926, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1126
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 22, 1983
DocketNo. C7-82-1053
StatusPublished

This text of 331 N.W.2d 926 (State v. Boynton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Boynton, 331 N.W.2d 926, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1126 (Mich. 1983).

Opinion

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1982), from a sentencing departure by the district court in the form of a stay of imposition of sentence in a ease in which the Sentencing Guidelines recommend imposition and execution of sentence. This ease is a companion case to State v. Hennessy, 328 N.W.2d 442 (Minn.1983), where, on similar facts, we upheld a dispositional departure by the same judge with respect to defendant’s accomplice. That case controls, and we affirm.

Affirmed.

KELLEY, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hennessy
328 N.W.2d 442 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 N.W.2d 926, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boynton-minn-1983.