State v. Boyles

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boyles

547 S.W.3d 825

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 2018·No. WD 80570·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

Cedric Boyles appeals his convictions for involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Cedric Boyles appeals his convictions for involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment. He contends there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Boyles, 547 S.W.3d 825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

547 S.W.3d 825 (State v. Boyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.