State v. Boyer
Opinion
Mary Boyer, Constance Cooper, Katherine Kenaga, Anthony Nitti, Kenneth Smith, and Cynthia Verenski entered pleas of no contest to possessing marijuana as party to a crime. See § 161.01(4), Stats, (defining "controlled substance" to mean "a drug, substance or immediate precursor" listed in "schedules I to V" in §§161.11-161.24, Stats.); § 161.14(4)(t), Stats, (classifying as a "Schedule I" controlled substance "Tetrahydrocannabinols, commonly known as 'THC, in any form including tetrahydrocan-nabinols contained in marijuana, obtained from marijuana or chemically synthesized"); § 161.41(3r), Stats, (subjecting a person unlawfully possessing "tetrahydrocannabinols, listed at s. 161.14(4)(t)" to a fine of "not more than $1,000" or incarceration "for not more than 6 months or both"); § 939.05, STATS, (the party-to-a-crime statute). The trial court deferred entry of judgment pursuant to § 161.47, STATS. 1 The *840 State contends that this was improper, and appeals. We reverse.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether § 161.47, Stats., permits a trial court to defer prosecution for the possession of marijuana made unlawful by § 161.41(3r), STATS. This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we analyze de novo. See State v. R.B., 108 Wis. 2d 494, 496, 322 N.W.2d 502, 503 (Ct. App. 1982) (construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo review on appeal). A statute that is clear on its face must be applied as it is written, State v. Dwyer, 181 Wis. 2d 826, 836, 512 N.W.2d 233, 236 (Ct. App. 1994), without resort to legislative history, Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Anderson, 191 Wis. 2d 278, 284, 528 N.W.2d 502, 505 (Ct. App. 1995).
*841 Section 161.47, STATS., permits the trial court to "defer further proceedings" "without entering a judgment of guilt" in cases involving persons who "plead[ ] guilty or [are] found guilty of possession or attempted possession of a controlled substance under s. 161.41(3)," as long as the defendants have not "previously been convicted" of any drug-related offense. Section 161.41(3), Stats., makes it a misdemeanor "punishable under s. 939.61" for any person to unlawfully "possess or attempt to possess a controlled substance, other than a controlled substance classified in schedule I or II that is a narcotic drug," "[ejxcept as provided in subs. (3m), (3n), (3p) and (3r)." (Emphasis added.) 2 As noted, the defendants were charged with, and pleaded no contest to, possessing marijuana in violation of § 161.41(3r), Stats., which makes the potential penalty a fine of "not more than $1,000" or incarceration "for not more than 6 months or both" *842 rather than the penalties imposed by § 161.41(3) via § 939.61, Stats. — a fine of "not more than $500" or incarceration for "not more than 30 days or both." 3
We must, of course, apply statutes so that every word and clause is "given effect." Donaldson v. State, 93 Wis. 2d 306, 315, 286 N.W.2d 817, 821 (1980). The unambiguous reference to § 161.41(3) in § 161.47(1), Stats., the statute that permits trial courts to defer proceedings, means that proceedings may only be deferred for those convicted of crimes encompassed by § 161.41(3), which expressly excludes subsection (3r). The defendants pled no contest to the possession of marijuana made unlawful by § 161.41(3r). Accordingly, deferral under § 161.47 was not permitted. 4
*843 By the Court. — Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
543 N.W.2d 562 (State v. Boyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.