State v. Boyd
560 P.2d 689, 28 Or. App. 725, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2709
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 28, 1977
DocketNo. C 76-06-07814 Cr, CA 7074
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 560 P.2d 689 (State v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Boyd, 560 P.2d 689, 28 Or. App. 725, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2709 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
Opinion
ORS 164.135(l)(c) reads:
"(1) A person commits the crime of unauthorized use of a vehicle when:
"(c) Having custody of a vehicle, boat or aircraft pursuant to an agreement with the owner thereof whereby such vehicle, boat or aircraft is to be returned to the owner at a specified time, he knowingly retains or withholds possession thereof without consent of the owner for so lengthy a period beyond the specified time as to render such retention or possession a gross deviation from the agreement.”
The trial court held the statute unconstitutionally vague. We find to the contrary. State v. Samter, 4 Or App 349, 479 P2d 237 (1971).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Owens
638 P.2d 1182 (Utah Supreme Court, 1981)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
560 P.2d 689, 28 Or. App. 725, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boyd-orctapp-1977.