State v. Boyd

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boyd

491 S.W.3d 315, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2016 WL 3180235

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 7, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102669

StatusPublished

This text of 491 S.W.3d 315 (State v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boyd, 491 S.W.3d 315, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2016 WL 3180235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

•PER CURIAM

James D. Boyd, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered, after a jury trial convicting him of domestic assault in the second degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court-did no.t. commit reversible error. State v. Julius, 453 S.W.3d 288, 299 (Mo.App.E.D.2014), An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of. Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

•PER CURIAM

James D. Boyd, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered, after a jury trial convicting him of domestic assault in the second degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court-did no.t. commit reversible error. State v. Julius, 453 S.W.3d 288, 299 (Mo.App.E.D.2014), An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of. Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

491 S.W.3d 315, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2016 WL 3180235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boyd-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack