State v. Boyd

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boyd

491 S.W.3d 315, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2016 WL 3180235

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 2016·No. No. ED 102669·Published

Opinion

ORDER

•PER CURIAM

James D. Boyd, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered, after a jury trial convicting him of domestic assault in the second degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court-did no.t. commit reversible error. State v. Julius, 453 S.W.3d 288, 299 (Mo.App.E.D.2014), An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of. Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

•PER CURIAM

James D. Boyd, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered, after a jury trial convicting him of domestic assault in the second degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court-did no.t. commit reversible error. State v. Julius, 453 S.W.3d 288, 299 (Mo.App.E.D.2014), An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of. Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Boyd, 491 S.W.3d 315, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 568, 2016 WL 3180235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

491 S.W.3d 315 (State v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related