State v. Boyd

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boyd

400 S.W.3d 408, 2013 WL 1121942, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 349

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 19, 2013·No. No. WD 74552·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Boyd appeals his conviction following a jury trial of class A felony domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in (1) sustaining the State’s motion [409] to disqualify defense counsel and (2) failing sua sponte to declare a mistrial during the prosecutor’s closing argument. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Boyd appeals his conviction following a jury trial of class A felony domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, RSMo Cum.Supp.2011, and sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment. He contends that the trial court plainly erred in (1) sustaining the State’s motion [409] to disqualify defense counsel and (2) failing sua sponte to declare a mistrial during the prosecutor’s closing argument. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Boyd, 400 S.W.3d 408, 2013 WL 1121942, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

400 S.W.3d 408 (State v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.