State v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Boyd

174 So. 3d 1153, 2015 La. LEXIS 1689, 2015 WL 5036490

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 12, 2015

DocketNo. 2015-KK-1366

StatusPublished

This text of 174 So. 3d 1153 (State v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boyd, 174 So. 3d 1153, 2015 La. LEXIS 1689, 2015 WL 5036490 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 513-029; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2015-K-0566.

Granted. We find that the Trial Court erred in conflating the evidentiary analysis in considering the admissibility of evidence of other crimes with the evidentiary analysis applicable to a motion for severance. Evidence of other crimes is considered prejudicial, but the weight of the prejudice must outweigh its probative value. State v. Wright, 2011-0141 (La.12/6/11), 79 So.3d 309, 318. Here, we find any prejudice from the evidence of other crimes does not outweigh its probative value. Accordingly, we find the Trial Court abused its discretion and reverse. The State’s motion to introduce evidence of similar crimes pursuant to La. C.E. art. 412.2 is granted. The case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON, C.J., WEIMER and HUGHES, JJ., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. H, No. 513-029; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2015-K-0566.

Granted. We find that the Trial Court erred in conflating the evidentiary analysis in considering the admissibility of evidence of other crimes with the evidentiary analysis applicable to a motion for severance. Evidence of other crimes is considered prejudicial, but the weight of the prejudice must outweigh its probative value. State v. Wright, 2011-0141 (La.12/6/11), 79 So.3d 309, 318. Here, we find any prejudice from the evidence of other crimes does not outweigh its probative value. Accordingly, we find the Trial Court abused its discretion and reverse. The State’s motion to introduce evidence of similar crimes pursuant to La. C.E. art. 412.2 is granted. The case is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON, C.J., WEIMER and HUGHES, JJ., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 So. 3d 1153, 2015 La. LEXIS 1689, 2015 WL 5036490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boyd-la-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack