State v. Boyce

Superior Court of Delaware

State v. Boyce

69 A.2d 921, 45 Del. 141, 1949 Del. Super. LEXIS 69

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedDecember 8, 1949

DocketNo. 588

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.2d 921 (State v. Boyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boyce, 69 A.2d 921, 45 Del. 141, 1949 Del. Super. LEXIS 69 (Del. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Layton, Judge.

The question presented by this motion is whether or not the Statute of Limitations of three years has run against Plaintiff’s claim. In my opinion it has. Dillon v. Board of Pension Commis[143]*143sioners, 18 Cal. 2d 427, 116 P. 2d 37, 136 A. L. R. 800; Barney v. City of Lincoln, 144 Neb. 537, 13 N. W. 2d 870.

Plaintiff relies upon a line of authorities which superficially support his position. Upon closer examination, however, the facts of these cases reveal that, prior to the bringing of petitioner’s suit to recover his pension, his right thereto had been established. Dryden v. Board of Pension Commissioners, 6 Cal. 2d 575, 59 P. 2d 104; Donnellan v. O’Dwyer, 189 Misc. 121, 67 N. Y. S. 2d 642. This distinguishing feature is clearly apparent, and is commented on at length, in the Dillon case, 116 P. 2d at page 40, 136 A. L. R. 800. See also 189 Misc. 121., 67 N. Y. S. 2d at page 650.¹ What the result would be here had Plaintiff established his right to a pension within three years of his retirement and then failed to institute an action to recover an installment for more than three years thereafter is a question not raised by this motion.

For the reasons just stated I have no alternative but to grant-the motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Layton, Judge.

The question presented by this motion is whether or not the Statute of Limitations of three years has run against Plaintiff’s claim. In my opinion it has. Dillon v. Board of Pension Commis[143]*143sioners, 18 Cal. 2d 427, 116 P. 2d 37, 136 A. L. R. 800; Barney v. City of Lincoln, 144 Neb. 537, 13 N. W. 2d 870.

Plaintiff relies upon a line of authorities which superficially support his position. Upon closer examination, however, the facts of these cases reveal that, prior to the bringing of petitioner’s suit to recover his pension, his right thereto had been established. Dryden v. Board of Pension Commissioners, 6 Cal. 2d 575, 59 P. 2d 104; Donnellan v. O’Dwyer, 189 Misc. 121, 67 N. Y. S. 2d 642. This distinguishing feature is clearly apparent, and is commented on at length, in the Dillon case, 116 P. 2d at page 40, 136 A. L. R. 800. See also 189 Misc. 121., 67 N. Y. S. 2d at page 650.¹ What the result would be here had Plaintiff established his right to a pension within three years of his retirement and then failed to institute an action to recover an installment for more than three years thereafter is a question not raised by this motion.

For the reasons just stated I have no alternative but to grant-the motion to dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.2d 921, 45 Del. 141, 1949 Del. Super. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boyce-delsuperct-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack