State v. Boxley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Boxley

294 S.W.3d 139, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 3260002

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 2009

DocketED 92064

StatusPublished

This text of 294 S.W.3d 139 (State v. Boxley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Boxley, 294 S.W.3d 139, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 3260002 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, David B oxley, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree, in violation of section 569.080 RSMo. (Supp. 2008), and one count of driving while license revoked, in violation of section 302.321, 1 The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment for the tampering and one year for driving while revoked. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (Supp. 2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, David B oxley, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree, in violation of section 569.080 RSMo. (Supp. 2008), and one count of driving while license revoked, in violation of section 302.321, 1 The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment for the tampering and one year for driving while revoked. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo. (Supp. 2008).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 S.W.3d 139, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488, 2009 WL 3260002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-boxley-moctapp-2009.